Mike Sullivan Confident Adam Fox Will Propel Himself Into Norris-Trophy Discussion
New York Rangers head coach Mike Sullivan has high hopes for Adam Fox this upcoming season.
Despite having a Norris Trophy on his resume while also being one of the most productive defensemen in the NHL over the past few years, the perception around Fox has been surprisingly negative as of late.
This comes after his statistics took a dip during the 2024-25 season and he did not perform up to expectations when playing for Team USA at the 4 Nations Face-Off.
Sullivan believes that Fox can reinvigorate his game and has the utmost confidence in the veteran defenseman.
“I think ‘Foxy’ knows he’s capable of a better game. And him and I have had discussions about it, and I think he’s inspired with the opportunity to bring a better version of himself,” Sullivan said via The Athletic. “And I told him when I became his coach that I was going to do everything in my power to help him become the best version of himself.”
Not only does Sullivan believe Fox will be productive, but he’s optimistic Fox could put himself right back in the Norris-Trophy discussion.
“We think, we believe, that Foxy’s capable of a next-level game. A Norris Trophy-caliber game,” Sullivan said. “You don’t win the Norris Trophy if you’re not capable of that, and we believe he still is.”
The 27-year-old defenseman also has a chance to make Team USA's team for the 2026 Winter Olympics, coached by Sullivan.
Why Depth Matters More Than Stars For The Flyers
In hockey, the allure of the “savior” player is almost impossible to resist. Fans dream of a generational scorer who can break open games singlehandedly, the kind of player who defines an era and guarantees relevance with every shift.
Philadelphia knows this feeling all too well.
For years, the Flyers were defined by one franchise centerpiece—Claude Giroux—and while his brilliance kept them competitive, it never quite pushed them over the edge.
Now, the Flyers face a choice. Do they keep pushing chips to the middle in hopes of landing the guy who can elevate them overnight? Or do they keep stacking depth, fortifying four lines and three pairings until they’re impossible to push around?
The contrarian answer—and maybe the smarter one for where this team is today—is that depth is the better bet.
Why Depth Wins More Than We Admit
Hockey isn’t basketball. In the NBA, one transcendent player can change the trajectory of a franchise. In the NHL, even a transcendent talent like Connor McDavid can’t win on his own. The Edmonton Oilers have been a contender, yes, but their path to success only really opened once they finally insulated McDavid and Leon Draisaitl with reliable depth.
Depth smooths the peaks and valleys of an 82-game season. It insulates a team from injuries. It gives coaches flexibility to match up against any opponent. More importantly, it builds a team identity rooted not in the whims of one superstar, but in a system of interchangeable parts that can roll over opponents with relentless consistency.
That’s what the Flyers are building now—and why they’re better off leaning into it.
The Flyers’ Current Formula
Look at the makeup of the roster: Matvei Michkov might one day be the kind of player who tilts games like McDavid, Auston Matthews, or Nathan MacKinnon, but he doesn’t need to carry the entire weight of the organization.
Instead, he fits into a group where Travis Konecny scores at a near point-per-game pace, Owen Tippett adds another dangerous shooter, Tyson Foerster continues to develop into a complete top-six winger, and players like Trevor Zegras and Noah Cates add their own dimensions.
On defense, Travis Sanheim has stepped into the role of true No. 1, Cam York has shown he can skate with the league’s best, and Nick Seeler provides a dependable, physical backbone. Jamie Drysdale, when healthy, offers an inimitable offensive spark.
None of these players alone make the Flyers a juggernaut. But together, they form a roster that can play entire games and show up period after period, no matter who is on the ice—and in today’s NHL, that’s more valuable than hoping one savior player erases flaws.
The Problem With the “Savior”
Relying on a singular superstar can lead to dangerous roster construction. Teams that go all-in for the guy often overpay and sacrifice the supporting cast.
Look at Toronto, who locked themselves into a “core four” model. Yes, Auston Matthews, Mitch Marner (who is now with the Vegas Golden Knights), John Tavares, and William Nylander were elite. But surrounding them with depth was a perpetual challenge, and the Leafs struggled to break through in the playoffs because hockey’s margins are too thin to survive on star power alone.
The Flyers can avoid this trap. Their current trajectory is about balance, resilience, and layers of contributors. That doesn’t mean they’ll ignore stars — Michkov is a potential franchise cornerstone, and Zegras, Tippett, and Konecny all have high-end upside. But instead of chasing a mythical savior, the Flyers are better off creating a system where any line can score, any pairing can defend, and any night, the hero can be someone unexpected.
Depth Now, Stars Later
None of this is to say the Flyers should turn their back on elite talent if it becomes available. If Danny Briere has the chance to add a franchise-altering player via trade or free agency down the line, of course you do it. But that can’t be the plan right now.
The plan, today, is to make sure the Flyers can ice four legitimate lines and three dependable pairings every single night. It’s to create a team where the pressure isn't on one singular player to be in top form every single night, because that is simply unrealistic in a full NHL season. It’s to give the Flyers a foundation that ensures when the big names do arrive, they slot into a structure that makes sense.
The Contrarian Path
So while it’s tempting to dream about one marquee addition changing everything, the smarter, more sustainable bet is depth.
The Flyers don’t need a savior. They need all of their players pulling in the same direction. They need to become a team that opponents hate to play against because there’s never an easy shift.
Superstars may get eyeballs on the television, but true, consistent depth gets players' names on Stanley Cups.
